🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish other types of electoral districts – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.