🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with the United States provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and revealed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with the American leader claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, European countries used their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The US president recently stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be resolved by military means. He asserted the attacks started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to impose their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the ultimate solution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, regulations and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the identical tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the government and the state in the wake of this invasion."